A little information before you start reading. This is an article (of a research) for Mayan’s Calender. I believe something will happen on 2012, as it will be the exact year with the end of Ancient Mayan’s Calender. Lastly, Zoiz Spells for 2012.
Why did the ancient Mayan or pre-Maya choose December 21st, 2012 A.D., as the
end of their Long Count calendar? This article will cover some recent research.
Scholars have known for decades that the 13-baktun cycle of the Mayan “Long
Count” system of timekeeping was set to end precisely on a winter solstice, and
that this system was put in place some 2300 years ago. This amazing fact – that
ancient Mesoameri- can skywatchers were able to pinpoint a winter solstice far
off into the future – has not been dealt with by Mayanists. And why did they
choose the year 2012? One immediately gets the impression that there is a very
strange mystery to be confronted here. I will be building upon a clue to this
mystery reported by epigrapher Linda Schele in Maya Cosmos (1994). This article
is the natural culmination of the research relating to the Mayan Long Count and
the precession of the equinoxes that I explored in my recent book Tzolkin:
Visionary Perspectives and Calendar Studies (Borderlands Science and Research
Foundation, 1994).
Classic Period is thought to have lasted from 200 A.D. to 900 A.D., but recent
archeological findings are pushing back the dawn of Mayan civilization in
Mesoamerica. Large ruin sites indicating high culture with distinctly Mayan
antecedents are being found in the jungles of Guatemala dating back to before
the common era. And even before this, the Olmec civilization flourished and
developed the sacred count of 260 days known as the tzolkin. The early Maya
adopted two different time keeping systems, the “Short Count” and the Long
Count. The Short Count derives from combining the tzolkin cycle with the solar
year and the Venus cycle of 584 days. In this way, “short” periods of 13, 52 and
104 years are generated. Unfortunately, we won’t have occasion to dwell on the
properties of the so-called Short Count system here. The Long Count system is
somewhat more abstract, yet is also related to certain astronomical cycles. It
is based upon nested cycles of days multiplied at each level by that key Mayan
number, twenty:
Number of Days / Term
where the uinal period is instead multiplied by 18 to make the 360-day tun. The
Maya employed this counting system to track an unbroken sequence of days from
the time it was inaugurated. The Mayan scholar Munro Edmonson believes that the
Long Count was put in place around 355 B.C. This may be so, but the oldest Long
Count date as yet found corresponds to 32 B.C. We find Long Count dates in the
archeological record beginning with the baktun place value and separated by
dots. For example: 6.19.19.0.0 equals 6 baktuns, 19 katuns, 19 tuns, 0 uinals
and 0 days. Each baktun has 144000 days, each katun has 7200 days, and so on. If
we add up all the values we find that 6.19.19.0.0 indicates a total of 1007640
days have elapsed since the Zero Date of 0.0.0.0.0. The much discussed 13-baktun
cycle is completed 1872000 days (13 baktuns) after 0.0.0.0.0. This period of
time is the so called Mayan “Great Cycle” of the Long Count and equals 5125.36
years.But how are we to relate this to a time frame we can understand? How does
this Long Count relate to our Gregorian calendar? This problem of correlating
Mayan time with “western” time has occupied Mayan scholars since the beginning.
The standard question to answer became: what does 0.0.0.0.0 (the Long Count
“beginning” point) equal in the Gregorian calendar? When this question is
answered, archeological inscriptions can be put into their proper historical
context and the end date of the 13-baktun cycle can be calculated. After years
of considering data from varied fields such as astronomy, ethnography,
archeology and iconography, J. Eric S. Thompson determined that 0.0.0.0.0
correponded to the Julian date 584283, which equals August 11th, 3114 B.C. in
our Gregorian calendar. This means that the end date of 13.0.0.0.0, some 5125
years later, is December 21st, 2012 A.D.1The relationship between the Long Count and Short Count has always been
internally consistent (both were tracked alongside each other in an unbroken
sequence since their conception). Now it is very interesting to note that an
aspect of the “Short Count”, namely, the sacred tzolkin count of 260 days, is
still being followed in the highlands of Guatemala. As the Mayan scholar Munro
Edmonson shows in The Book of the Year, this last surviving flicker of a
calendar tradition some 3000 years old supports the Thompson correlation of
584283. Edmonson also states that the Long Count was begun by the Maya or
pre-Maya around 355 B.C., but there is reason to believe that the Long Count
system was being perfected for at least 200 years prior to that date.The point of interest for these early astronomers seems to have been the
projected end date in 2012 A.D., rather than the beginning date in 3114 B.C.
Having determined the end date in 2012 (for reasons we will come to shortly),
and calling it 13.0.0.0.0, they thus proclaimed themselves to be living in the
6th baktun of the Great Cycle. The later Maya certainly attributed much
mythological significance to the beginning date, relating it to the birth of
their deities, but it now seems certain that the placement of the Long Count
hinges upon its calculated end point. Why did early Mesoamerican skywatchers
pick a date some 2300 years into the future and, in fact, how did they pinpoint
an accurate winter solstice? With all these considerations one begins to suspect
that, for some reason, the ancient New World astronomers were tracking
precession.
by the slow wobbling of the earth’s polar axis. Right now this axis roughly
points to Polaris, the “Pole Star,” but this changes slowly over long periods of
time. The earth’s wobble causes the position of the seasonal quarters to slowly
precess against the background of stars. For example, right now, the winter
solstice position is in the constellation of Sagittarius. But 2000 years ago it
was in Capricorn. Since then, it has precessed backward almost one full sign. It
is generally thought that the Greek astronomer Hipparchus was the first to
discover precession around 128 B.C. Yet scholarship indicates that more ancient
Old World cultures such as the Egyptians (see Schwaller de Lubicz’s book Sacred
Science) and Babylonians also knew about the precession.I have concluded that even cultures with simple horizon astronomy and oral
records passed down for a hundred years or so, would notice the slow shifting of
the heavens. For example, imagine that you lived in an environment suited for
accurately demarcated horizon astronomy. Even if this wasn’t the case, you might
erect monoliths to sight the horizon position of, most likely, the dawning
winter solstice sun. This position in relation to background stars could be
accurately preserved in oral verse or wisdom teachings, to be passed down for
centuries. Since precession will change this position at the rate of 1 degree
every 72 years, within the relatively short time of 100 years or so, a
noticeable change will have occurred. The point of this is simple. To early
cultures attuned to the subtle movements of the sky, precession would not have
been hard to notice.2The Maya are not generally credited with knowing about the precession of the
equinoxes. But considering everything else we know about the amazing
sophistication of Mesoamerican astronomy, can we realistically continue to deny
them this? Many of the as yet undeciphered hieroglyphs may ultimately describe
precessional myths. Furthermore, as I show in my book Tzolkin: Visionary
Perspectives and Calendar Studies, the Long Count is perfectly suited for
predicting future seasonal quarters, indefinitely, and precession is
automatically accounted for. Some of the most incredible aspects of Mayan
cosmo-conception are just now being discovered. As was the case with the state
of Egyptology in the 1870′s, we still have a lot to learn. In addition,
Mayanists like Gordon Brotherston (The Book of the Fourth World) consider
precessional knowledge among Mesoamerican cultures to be more than likely.
winter solstice of 2012 and, exactly how were calculations made so accurately,
considering that precession should make them exceedingly difficult?If we make a standard horoscope chart for December 21st, 2012 A.D., nothing
very unusual appears. In this way I was led astray in my search until Linda
Schele provided a clue in the recent book Maya Cosmos. Probably the most
exciting breakthrough in this book is her identification of the astronomical
meaning of the Mayan Sacred Tree. Drawing from an impressive amount of
iconographic evidence, and generously sharing the process by which she arrived
at her discovery, the Sacred Tree is found to be none other than the crossing
point of the ecliptic with the band of the Milky Way. Indeed, the Milky Way
seems to have played an important role in Mayan imagery. For example, an incised
bone from 8th century Tikal depicts a long sinking canoe containing various
deities. This is a picture of the night sky and the canoe is the Milky Way,
sinking below the horizon as the night progresses, and carrying with it deities
representing the nearby constellations. The incredible Mayan site of Palenque is
filled with Sacred Tree motifs and references to astronomical events. In their
book Forest of Kings, Schele and Freidel suggested that the Sacred Tree referred
to the ecliptic. Apparently that was only part of the picture, for the Sacred
Tree that Pacal ascends in death is more than just the ecliptic, it is the
sacred doorway to the underworld. The crossing point of Milky Way and ecliptic
is this doorway and represents the sacred source and origin. In the following
diagram of the well known sarcophagus carving, notice that the Milky Way tree
serves as an extension of Pacal’s umbilicus. The umbilicus is a human being’s
entrance into life, and entrance into death as well:
Diagram 1: Pacal and the Sacred Tree. spring from the Sacred Tree. The Sacred Tree is, in fact, at the center of the
entire corpus of Mayan Creation Myths. We should definitely explore the nature
of this astronomical feature.The first question that came up for me was as follows. Since Lord (Ahau)
Pacal is, by way of divine kingship, equated with the sun, and he is portrayed
“entering” the Sacred Tree on his famous sarcophagus lid, on what day does the
sun come around to conjunct the crossing point of ecliptic and Milky Way? This
would be an important date. In the pre-dawn skies of this date, the Milky Way
would be seen to arch overhead from the region of Polaris (Heart of Sky) and
would point right at where the sun rises. This (and the corollary date 6 months
later) is the only date when the Sun/Lord could jump from the ecliptic track and
travel the Milky Way up and around the vault of heaven to the region of Polaris,
there to enter the “Heart of Sky.” It should be mentioned that 1300 years ago,
during the zenith of Palenque’s glory, Polaris was much less an exact “Pole
Star” than it is now. Schele demonstrates that it wasn’t a Pole Star that the
Maya mythologized in this regard, it was the unmarked polar “dark region”
symbolizing death and the underworld around which everything was observed to
revolve. Life revolves around death – a characteristically Mayan belief. The
dates on which the sun conjuncts the “Sacred Tree” are thus very important.
These dates will change with precession. Schele doesn’t pursue this line of
reasoning, however, and doesn’t even mention that these dates might be
significant. If we go back to 755 A.D., we find that the sun conjuncts the
Sacred Tree on December 3rd. I should point out here that the Milky Way is a
wide band, and perhaps a 10-day range of dates should be considered.To start with, however, I use the exact center of the Milky Way band that one
finds on star charts, known as the “Galactic Equator” (not to be confused with
Galactic Center). Where the Galactic Equator crosses the ecliptic in Sagittarius
just happens to be where the dark rift in the Milky Way begins. This is a dark
bifurcation in the Milky Way caused by interstellar dust clouds. To observers on
earth, it appears as a dark road which begins near the ecliptic and stretches
along the Milky Way up towards Polaris. The Maya today are quite aware of this
feature; the Quich» Maya call it xibalba be (the “road to Xibalba”) and the
Chorti Maya call it the “camino de Santiago”. In Dennis Tedlock’s translation of
the Popol Vuh, we find that the ancient Maya called it the “Black Road”. The
Hero Twins Hunahpu and Xbalanque must journey down this road to battle the Lords
of Xibalba. (Tedlock 334, 358). Furthermore, what Schele has identified as the
Sacred Tree was known to the ancient Quich» simply as “Crossroads.”This celestial feature was not marginal in ancient Mayan thought and is still
rec- ognized even today. In terms of how this feature was mythologized, it seems
that when a planet, the sun, or the moon entered the dark cleft of the Milky Way
in Sagittarius (which happens to be the exact center of the Milky Way, the
Galactic Equator), entrance to the underworld road was possible, which could
then take the journeyer up to the Heart of Sky. Shamanic vision rites were
probably involved in this scenario. In the Yucatan, underground caves were
ritual places used by shaman to journey to the underworld. Schele explains that
“Mayan mythology identifies the Road to Xibalba as going through a cave” (Forest
of Kings, 209). Here we have a metaphorical reference to the “dark rift” in the
Milky Way by way of its terrestrial counterpart, a syncretism between earth and
sky which is characteristic of Mayan thinking. Above all, what is becoming
apparent from the corpus of Mayan Creation Myths is that creation seems to have
taken place at a celestial crossroads – the crossing point of ecliptic and Milky
Way.To clarify this ever growing picture, we should stop here and plot out some
charts. In addition to the detailed star maps from Norton’s 2000.0 Star Atlas
which allowed me to pinpoint the crossing point of Galactic Equator and
ecliptic, I use EZCosmos to plot these positions3. What I found answers the
question of why the Maya chose the winter solstice of 2012, a problem seemingly
avoided by astronomers and Mayanists alike. While it is true that the sun
conjuncts the Sacred Tree on December 3rd in the year 755 A.D., over the
centuries precession has caused the conjunction date to approach the winter
solstice. So, how close are we to perfect conjunction today? Exactly when might
we expect the winter solstice sun to conjunct the crossing point of Galactic
Equator and ecliptic – the Mayan Sacred Tree? Any astronomer will tell you that,
presently, the Milky Way crosses the ecliptic through the constellation of
Sagittarius and this area is rich in nebulae and high density objects. In fact,
where the Milky Way crosses the ecliptic in Sagittarius also happens to be the
direction of the Galactic Center.4
represent some kind of astronomical anomoly. I’ll get right to the heart of the
matter. Let’s look at a few charts.
Chart 1. of the Milky Way can be seen stretching from the lower right to the upper left.
The more or less vertical dotted line indicates the Galactic Equator. The
planets can be seen tracing a roughly horizontal path through the chart,
indicating the ecliptic. The sun, quite strikingly, is dead center in the Sacred
Tree. Let’s look closer.
Chart 2. degrees. Part of the constellation of Sagittarius can be seen in the lower left
portion of the chart. The planet in the middle-to-upper left portion of the
chart is Pluto, which rarely travels directly along the ecliptic. The center
square near the sun is placed on the Trifid Nebula (M20). According to the star
chart I used, this nebula is very close to the crossing point of Galactic
Equator and ecliptic. However, a small star (4 Sgr) is even closer; it sits
right on the Galactic Equator and its declination is only 00 .08′ below the
ecliptic. Let’s look closer at these features.
Chart 3. within conjunction. The dot to the lower right of the sun is the star 4 Sgr.
Amazingly, the Sun is right on target. We couldn’t have hoped for a closer
conjunction. 1 day before or after will remove the sun a noticeable distance
from the crossing point. December 21st, 2012 (13.0.0.0.0 in the Long Count)
therefore represents an extremely close conjunction of the winter solstice sun
with the crossing point of Galactic Equator and the ecliptic, what the ancient
Maya recognized as the Sacred Tree. It is critical to understand that the winter
solstice sun rarely conjuncts the Sacred Tree. In fact, this is an event that
has been coming to resonance very slowly over thousands and thousands of years.
What this might mean astrologically, how this might effect the “energy weather”
on earth, must be treated as a separate topic.But I should at least mention in passing that this celestial convergence
appears to parallel the accelerating pace of human civilization. It should be
noted that because precession is a very slow process, similar astronomical
alignments will be evident on the winter solstice dates within perhaps 5 years
on either side of 2012. However, the accuracy of the conjunction of 2012 is
quite astounding, beyond anything deemed calculable by the ancient Maya, and
serves well to represent the perfect mid-point of the process.Let’s go back to the dawn of the Long Count and try to reconstruct what may
have been happening.
B.C. (see Edmonson’s Book of the Year). We may suspect that astronomical
observations were being made from at least that point. The tzolkin count has
been followed unbroken since at least that time, up to the present day,
demonstrating the high premium placed by the Maya upon continuity of tradition.
In this way, star records, horizon positions of the winter solstice sun, and
other pertinent observations could also have been accurately preserved. As
suggested above, precession can be noticed by way of even simple horizon
astronomy in as little time as 100 to 150 years. (Hipparchus, the alleged
“discoverer” of precession among the Greeks, compared his own observations with
data collected only 170 years before his time.) Following Edmonson, the Long
Count system may have appeared as early as 355 B.C. Part of the reason for
implementing the Long Count system, as I will show, was probably to calculate
future winter solstice dates.We must assume that even at this early point in Mesoamerican history, the
crossing point of ecliptic and Milky Way was understood as the “Sacred Tree”.
Since the Sacred Tree concept is intrinsically tied into the oldest Mayan
Creation Myths, this is not improbable. At the very least, the “dark rift” was
already a recognized feature. Early skywatchers of this era (355 B.C.) would
then observe the sun to conjunct the dark ridge in the Milky Way on or around
November 18th.5 This would be easily observed in the pre-dawn sky as described
above: the Milky Way points to the rising sun on this date.Over a relatively short period of time, as an awareness of precession was
emerging, this date was seen to slowly approach winter solstice, a critical date
in its own right in early Mayan cosmo-conception. At this point, precession and
the rate of precession was calculated, the Long Count was perfected and
inaugurated, and the appropriate winter solstice date in 2012 A.D. was found via
the Long Count in the following way.
1.7.0.0.0 days (194400 days). This is an easily tracked Long Count interval.
Starting with the katun beginning of 650 B.C.:
as well. It is, indeed, the end date of 2012.6The Long Count may have been officially inaugurated on a specific date in 355
B.C., as Edmonson suggests, but it must have been formulated, tried, tested, and
proven before this date. This may well have taken centuries, and the process no
doubt paralleled (and was perhaps instigated by) the discovery of precession.
The Long Count system automatically accounts for precession in its ability to
calculate future seasonal quarters – a property which shouldn’t be
underestimated.
why and how of the end date of the 13-baktun cycle of the Mayan Long Count. The
solution requires a shift in how we think about the astronomy of the Long Count
end date. The strange fact that it occurs on a winter solstice immediately
points us to possible astronomical reasons, but they are not obvious. We also
shouldn’t forget the often mentioned fact that the 13-baktun cycle of some 5125
years is roughly 1/5th of a precessional cycle. This in itself should have been
suggestive of a deeper mystery very early on. Only with the recent
identification of the astronomical nature of the Sacred Tree has the puzzle
revealed its fullness. And once again we are amazed at the sophistication and
vision of the ancient New World astronomers, the decendants of whom still count
the days and watch the skies in the remote outbacks of Guatemala.This essay is not contrived upon sketchy evidence. It basically rests upon
two facts:1) the well known end date of the 13-baktun cycle of the Mayan Long Count,
which is December 21st, 2012 A.D. and2) the astronomical situation on that day. Based upon these two facts alone,
the creators of the Long Count knew about and calculated the rate of precession
over 2300 years ago. I can conceive of no other conclusion. To explain this away
as “coincidence” would only obscure the issue.For early Mesoamerican skywatchers, the slow approach of the winter solstice
sun to the Sacred Tree was seen as a critical process, the culmination of which
was surely worthy of being called 13.0.0.0.0, the end of a World Age. The
channel would then be open through the winter solstice doorway, up the Sacred
Tree, the Xibalba be , to the center of the churning heavens, the Heart of Sky.Notes:1Linda Schele and David Freidel, unlike most Mayanists, continue to support
the work of Floyd Lounsbury in promoting the 584285 correlation. This is 2 days
off from the Thompson correlation that I use. The decisive factor in supporting
the Thompson correlation of 584283 is the fact that it corresponds with the
tzolkin count still followed in the highlands of Guatemala. To account for this
discrepency in his correlation, Lounsbury claims that the count was shifted back
two days sometime before the conquest (not likely), thus explaining its present
placement. This means that either correlation will give the December 21st end
date. Nevertheless, Schele and Freidel still report that the end date is
December 23rd, 2012 rather than Dec. 21st, an unfortunate faux pas
understandable only because they aren’t particularly interested in the specifics
of the correlation debate. For a detailed discussion of this topic, refer to my
book Tzolkin: Visionary Perspectives and Calendar Studies.2Case in point is the mysterious existence of myths obviously describing
precession in the ancient verses of the Kalevala, the Finnish National Epic.
These myths were relayed from the earliest times by way of singers. Many of
these stories are thoroughly magical and are filled with sky lore. The Finnish
language is not of Indo- European origin and up until the late 19th century
peasants in Finland and northwestern Russia had little contact with Europe.
Indeed, their heritage suggests more contact with Central Asia than Europe. Some
of the Kalevala stories describe a sacred Mill called the Sampo (derived from
sanskrit Skambha = pillar or pole) with a “many ciphered cover”. This spinning
Mill is a metaphor for a Golden Age of plenty and the starry sky spinning around
the Pole Star (known as the Nail of the North), which in the Far North is almost
straight over head. The Mill at some point is disturbed, its pillar being pulled
out of its peg, and a new one – a new “age” – must be constructed. This becomes
the chore of Ilmarinen, the primeval smith. In this legend, ancient knowledge of
precession among unsophisticated “peasants” who were nonetheless astute
skywatchers, was preserved via oral tradition almost down to modern times.3EZCosmos is a graphic software package that can accurately plot and animate
the positions of planets, stars, nebula and so on, for 14,000 years. It is well
suited to this research because it accounts for precession in its positional
calculations. It also happens to be the software that Linda Schele used to
discover the astronomical meaning of the Mayan Sacred Tree.
4 Here we briefly converge with the ideas of Terence McKenna. In the book
he co- authored with his brother Dennis (Invisible Landscape, Seabury Press 1975
and Harper San Francisco, 1993), Terence suggests that the position of winter
solstice sun within 3 degrees of the Galactic Center in the year 2012 A.D. (a
“once-in-a-precessional- cycle” event) may provide the eschatological end point
for his theory of time known as Timewave Zero. His end date was chosen for
historical reasons and was, apparently, only later discovered to correspond with
the Mayan end date. The McKennas point out that this unusual astronomical
situation has been noted by other writers, namely, Giorgio de Santillana and
Hertha von Dechend in Hamlet’s Mill (1969). As ACS Publication’s The American
Ephemeris for the 21st Century shows, in the year 2012 the Galactic Center is at
27 Sagittarius (within 3 of winter solstice). Thus McKenna demonstrates that on
winter solstice of 2012, Galactic Center will be rising heliacally just before
dawn, in a way reminiscent of how the Maya observed Venus’s last morningstar
appearance.
5This basically follows the “1 degree every 72 years” rule of precession. In
this way, back in 3114 B.C. the sun conjuncted the Sacred Tree on Oct 10th,
which is 72 degrees, or 1/5th of the ecliptic from the winter solstice. The Fall
Equinox sun conjuncted the Sacred Tree about 6400 years ago (1/4th of a
precessional cycle). Ancient cultures in Mesopotamia may have recognized this
alignment, and called it a Golden Age. The fall from this state of alignment may
be responsible for the original Fall from Paradise myth, which filtered out to
the Judaic tradition.
6The Long Count has other strange astronomical properties. For instance, the
13- katun cycle of 256 years was known to the Yucatec Maya as a prophecy cycle.
We see it used in the Books of Chilam Balam. The astronomical reference here is
to conjunction cycles of Uranus and Pluto, two of which equal 256 years. From
another angle, 3 katuns equal exactly 37 synodical cycles of Venus.
Astrologer.
Press. 1992.Edmonson, Munro. The Book of the Year. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake
City, Utah. 1988.EZCosmos. Astrosoft, Inc. DeSoto, Texas. 1990.Jenkins, John Major. Tzolkin: Visionary Perspectives and Calendar Studies.
Borderlands Science and Research Foundation. Garberville, CA. 1994.Mayan Calendrics. Dolphin Software. 48 Shattuck Square #147, Berkeley, CA.
94704. 1989 &1993.
Meeus, Jean. Astronomical Tables of the Sun, Moon and Planets. Willmann- Bell
Publishers. Richmond, VA. 1983.
Michelsen, Neil F. The American Ephemeris for the 21st Century. ACS
Publications. San Diego, CA. 1982, 1988.
Ridpath, Ian (ed.). Norton’s 2000.0: Star Atlas and Reference Handbook.
Longman Group UK Limited. 1989.
Schele, Linda and Freidel, David. A Forest of Kings: The Untold Story of the
Ancient Maya. William Morrow and Company, Inc. New York. 1990.
Schele, Linda; Freidel, David; Parker, Joy. Maya Cosmos: Three Thousand Years
on the Shaman’s Path. William Morrow and Company, Inc. New York. 1993.
Tedlock, Dennis. The Popol Vuh: The Definitive Edition of the Mayan Book of
the Dawn of Life and the Glories of Gods and Kings. Simon & Schuster. New
York.
1985
Author’s Biographical Information:
John Major Jenkins (March 4th, 1964, 9:19 p.m., Chicago) is a student of
Mayan time. On several trips to Central America in the late 80′s, he worked and
lived with the Quich» and Tzutujil Maya in Guatemala. Observations gathered on
these trips were published in Chicago area newspapers. Since then he has devoted
his time to studying Mayan cosmo-conception and the mathematical and
philosophical properties of the sacred calendar. More thought provoking ideas
can be found in his recent book Tzolkin: Visionary Perspectives and Calendar
Studies (Borderlands Science and Research Foundation, 1994). Additional
information on the Mayan end date alignment is available by writing the author
at Four Ahau Press: P.O. Box 3; Boulder, CO 80306. Four Ahau Web Site
Hyperborea.
McKenna home
page
If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it!
